News items represent the views of the original writer or publisher, and not necessarily those of the Missouri Bicycle Federation, Inc.
Why is it OK to kill someone with your automobile?
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Walt Seifert of the Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates writes:
We frown on killing people with gun, knives or poison. If we catch the culprit the consequences can be harshlong sentences, life in prison or even the death penalty. We are much more forgiving when someone kills with a car, especially if the driver is sober and exhibits a bit of remorse. Generally, when motorists kill a pedestrian or cyclist, if they are charged at all, they get off with a slap on the wrist from the legal system. . . .
At least one study confirms the conclusion that not much happens to motorists who kill pedestrians or cyclists. In San Jose, during 2001 and 2002 there were 31 pedestrian and 6 cyclist fatalities. Of the 11 pedestrian cases in which the driver was at fault, 4 were charged.Of the 2 cyclist cases in which the driver was at fault, neither driver was charged. Drivers were not charged in more than 75 percent of the cases in which they were at fault.
Why are drivers not held accountable? Why is punishment so light?
There are many factors in play. Courts, juries and police officers may sympathize more with the driver than the victim. It could have been me driving, seems to be the thought. The number of people who share a cyclists perspective is small and cyclists are often viewed unsympathetically. Because of this district attorneys are reluctant to prosecute. When they do, there can be difficulty in getting a conviction.
We need to do a number of things differently. We need safer roads, with more crossings for pedestrians, lower speeds and much better traffic enforcement.
We need a legal system that is more just. Some places in the world assume drivers are at fault in all car crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists. There needs to be better-trained police officers who make unbiased and informed reports. Prosecutors must be willing to prosecute and judges and juries willing to convict.
We need motorists with a different attitude about the serious responsibilities that go along with the privilege of driving. Ina case that occurred in Orem, Utah, an eight-year old girl was in a crosswalk near an elementary school. A woman driving a mini-van rolled through the intersection and hit the child. The girl was spun around, suffered facial injuries and a dislocated shoulder.
The driver stopped only long enough to roll down her window and apologize. The girl's mother watched it all happen. The mother, Gloria Frutus, said, "I felt bad. I didn't think to say anything to the woman. She didn't say anything but, 'I'm sorry' and left."
In a way, this case is more chilling than the fatalities. The indifferent and casual attitude of the driver is profoundly disturbing. Hitting a little girl with a two-ton car is apparently simply a bother and no more serious than bumping someone in a crowd or inadvertently stepping on a foot.
Drivers are rarely out to killthey are not committing murder. Even though they lack the intent to do harm, their carelessness takes lives. Saying you're sorry is not enough. Being sorry is not enough. Punishing drivers won't bring back the victims, but serves justice and may save others by making all drivers more careful. Irresponsible driving that kills should have consequences.
